Live Together or Die Alone

People debate over all sorts of political questions — war, warming, racism, medicare, and so on — but the question beneath all the others is rarely mentioned: community versus individualism.

arrowsSome people see that as an emotional question, a question about our attitude toward our fellow human being. “Love is all you need,” they may say. Well, our attitudes and our institutions perpetuate each other; it’s a feedback loop. But we lie to others and to ourselves more easily about our attitudes, so I prefer to talk about our institutions and how they affect us.

The 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes said that the natural state of humans is a “war of all against all.” That’s a good description of our economic system of separate property, which has dominated the planet for 12,000 years. Hobbesians say greed is inherent in human nature, but I have a different explanation of its origin: Separate property causes competition, which causes fear, which causes greed.

better bargaining positionMoreover, separate property necessitates trade — for labor, food, everything. Trade favors the trader in the stronger bargaining position, so inequality increases; wealth becomes concentrated in few hands. Thus the non-wealthy chanted “we are the 99 percent” in Occupy Wall Street.

Money is influence, so we have been ruled by kings and plutocrats for 12,000 years. The so-called “democracies” of recent centuries are only an illusion: Gilens and Page demonstrated statistically that, regardless of elections, the rich get the public policies they want and the rest of us don’t. Their policies include measures to further enrich themselves at public expense, to retain their power. They also own and control the “mainstream” news media, and perpetuate the idea that the present system is just, natural, and the only system possible. Concentrated power corrupts, so poverty and war are based on lies for profit.

But a few indigenous tribes managed to avoid the Hobbesian lifestyle until recently. And the Hobbes system has only dominated the planet for 12,000 years. For the previous 200,000 years, we were all hunter-gatherers, living in tribes of 25 to 80 people, caring and sharing as friends and equals. That’s still what we teach our kids, still where we turn in crisis, still who we are genetically. Can we return to sharing, and should we?

Some people claim that humans are not capable of caring about more than 25 to 80 people, just the people we know personally. I can counter that claim easily. Many people have volunteered to fight and die in wars, “in defense of their country” — an entire society, mostly people they’d never met, far more than 25 to 80. Actually, they were fooled — they were fighting for one rich plutocrat against another — but that is beside the point; they volunteered because they believed they were defending their country.

The idea of sharing with everyone is not new:

  • Buddha said we should work to reduce our own suffering and the suffering of others, and much of the suffering comes from greed. As I explained earlier, greed comes from property.
  • Let’s put aside the supernatural tales of Jesus, and just look at the things he said (or at least, the things that his biographers said he said). He said that we should love one another, and share. His early followers did precisely that, as recounted in the book of Acts. The church kept this message hidden for many centuries, but the current pope is promoting it.
  • Marx said we the 99% should overthrow the 1%, who have been oppressing us, and then we the 99% should share. Of course, the 1% say that’s all wrong.
  • We’ve seen an assortment of communes and left-leaning governments, large and small, more of them since Marx’s time. Most have been overthrown by agents of plutocracy. In recent years, the CIA funnels money through the “National Endowment for Democracy,” for a coup dressed up to look like a popular uprising.

Sharing has always been available to humanity as a choice, but recently it has become a necessity for several reasons:

  • We’ve had many nuclear close calls. If we continue with the arms race, a nuclear war is sure to happen eventually. In its aftermath, the drifting clouds of radioactive fallout could kill everything.
  • climate cliffCorporations lobby to continue their ecocidal externalities. The ecosystem is being destroyed. In particular, climate change is speeding up, more than you’ll read in the corporate press, and it doesn’t stop at national borders. Soon, runaway feedback loops will cause enormous heating, killing everything. To stop this, we need to stop big oil, plastics, meat, and the military (which has an enormous carbon footprint).
  • As our economy grows, wildlife habitats shrink, and viruses cross over between species more often. We dodged a bullet with SARS (2003), H1N1 (2009), MERS (2012), Ebola (2014), Zika (2015), but our luck ran out with Covid (2019). The 2021 Delta variant is worse, and next year’s mutation may be worse still; it might even kill us all. Mutations will continue as long as the virus is out there — as long as Big Pharma is hoarding vaccine profits and anti-vaxxers are encouraged by fascist politicians.

We are on the verge of extinction. Even the rich hiding in their bunkers will quickly run out of canned food. We finally have selfish reasons for becoming unselfish. We can no longer live separately; we’ve but one Earth on which to live.

* * * *

2021 Nov 2, version 1.02.

%d bloggers like this: